16-02-2016 12:43 via theguardian.com

Tell us something we don't know: why science can't show us much about art

The scientific ‘discovery’ that Van Gogh’s art changed after his 1888 breakdown proves a forensic approach is no match for the subjective eye of an art lover Related: Science peers into Van Gogh's Bedroom to shine light on colors of artist's mind I am happy to announce a new annual award, the Vincent Prize for Scientifically Proving the Bleeding Obvious about Art History. The first winners are the researchers who, the papers tell us, have used chemical analysis of Vincent van G
Read more »